Daily activities of the owner of a 20 acre Organic
Farm plus
observations, notes, and comments on a wide variety of topics.
| 1 | New TV Show - "First &
Last" I decided what the world needs now is a new TV show. My new show would be called "First & Last" and each week would feature the very FIRST episode of some TV show, followed immediately by the LAST episode of the same show. Shows like Seinfield, Friends, MASH, All In The Family, etc. come quickly to mind. I think it would be interesting to see how these shows got off the ground and how they closed the doors. Hey, TV networks! - get busy on this, will ya? |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Bush - "Look To Future" (Why?) Amidst the whoopla of the new congress forming, there's some subtle coaching going on. I have noticed that recently President Bush keeps talking about "Looking to the future." While that may sound like a good approach, the subtle message between the lines is "Don't look in the past." I think the President is concerned (and rightly so) that the democratic congress will hold hearings on the past to find out the President lied about weapons of mass destruction being the reason for the start of the Iraq war. So I see the President's recent emphasis on "looking to the future" as a means to try to steer congress away from finding out what really happened in the past - for if the real truth about the start of the Iraq war came out, President Bush would be out of a job. |
| 5 | Today, I felt like writing a children's story. Here it is. Little Leroy Jones was the smallest boy in his class. For the last two days Little Leroy was sick and had to miss school. This morning Little Leroy woke up with a fever and his mom said "Youd better stay home from school again today." "Awww..." complained Little Leroy. In the last two days he had played all his games, read all his books, and watched all his movies. Today, Little Leroy wanted to do something different. He decided to watch the people at the bus stop near his house. "Mom, can I go outside and watch the people at the bus stop?" asked Little Leroy. Although it was cloudy, it was warm outside. And since Little Leroy was getting better his mom approved "You can go outside but stay on the porch. Youre still sick - so no playing around." "Ok, mom" responded Little Leroy. He moved a chair to get a comfortable view of the bus stop. After 10 minutes or so, Little Leroy watched as a gentle breeze blew some newspaper toward the bus stop. As luck would have it, the paper got caught in the supports for the bench at the bus stop. Soon, a man in a suit walked up to the bus stop. "Hey, mister!" shouted Little Leroy. "Why dont you pick up the newspaper?" "I dont see any newspaper" said the man who turned his body away from both the newspaper and Little Leroy. When the bus came, the man got on as quickly as he could. Next, a pretty lady came to the bus stop. "Hey, lady!" shouted Little Leroy. "Why dont you pick up the newspaper?" "Im a fashion model and dont want to get my hands dirty" came the reply. She also waited nervously and dashed aboard the next bus. Little Leroy called out to several people to pick up the newspaper, but nobody did. Some of their replies included: A man with a tool belt said "Its not my job." A teenage boy said "Its not cool." A teenage girl said "I wouldnt want my friends to see me." A lady with a shopping bag said "Im in too much of a hurry." A man wearing a cowboy hat said "I dont live here - Im just visiting." A man with a briefcase said "Im a banker and I only deal with really big, important things." A man talking on a cell phone said "I cant be bothered - Im talking on the phone." An old man with a beard said "Mind your own business!" Little Leroy decided to count how many people didnt pick up the newspaper. He went into the house and got a pencil and some paper. There were 10 quick marks on his paper. Then there were 20 - then 50. Little Leroy stopped counting late in the afternoon after he had 125 marks on his paper. "Mom, can we go over to the bus stop so I can pick up some newspaper?" asked Little Leroy. "Why do you want to do that?" asked his mom. Little Leroy told his mom about the people during the day and showed her the counting marks on his paper. "Sure, but walk with me" said his mom. In a few moments, Little Leroy had untangled the newspaper from the bench supports and placed the paper in the trash. "How does that make you feel?" asked his mom. "Really good" replied Little Leroy. "The newspaper was making the bus stop look dirty and the dirty bus stop was making our whole neighborhood look dirty." "Good for you" said his mom as she cupped her loving hand behind his head and gave him a gentle kiss on the forehead. "But mom . . . " said Little Leroy somewhat puzzled "if picking up the newspaper made our neighborhood look better - and when I picked up the newspaper I felt better - why wouldnt all those people pick up the newspaper?" His mom thought a moment and answered "Maybe none of them has been sick for 3 days like you and had the opportunity to think about the importance of the newspaper." That evening, Little Leroy thought about his day. He then thought about his city and all the bus stops in his city. "I wonder how many other bus stops might have had newspaper that needed to be picked up? I wonder if the people at those other bus stops took the time to pick up the paper or just left it like at our bus stop?" After some more thinking Little Leroy continued "I guess there isnt anything special about a bus stop - I guess there could be newspaper laying around in all sorts of places in our city." After more thought, Little Leroy added "And I guess there isnt anything special about newspaper - all sorts of papers, boxes, and trash might be everywhere in the city and maybe people arent doing anything about it." Little Leroy then started thinking what it might be like to be an adult. "Grownups are bigger, stronger, and smarter than kids. If they dont deal with the litter thats easy to see, maybe they dont deal with their grownup things either." The next morning, the early sun was shining on the bus stop. Little Leroy checked to make sure there wasnt any newspaper that he could see. His mom decided that Little Leroy was well enough to go to school. When his teacher asked him what he did while he was sick, he told his story of the newspaper at his bus stop. The teacher thanked him for his thoughtful story. At recess, many of his friends said they thought his story was stupid. Little Leroy kept remembering how bad the bus stop looked with the newspaper, how good the bus stop looked when the newspaper was removed, and how good he felt for having cleaned the place. How could something like that be stupid? He then wondered if his friends would become adults like those who had reasons for not picking up the newspaper themselves. Leroy decided right then that he would do something every day that would benefit his community and make him feel good in the process. To this very day, Leroy has kept his promise to himself. Leroy Jones never did grow to become very tall - however, he would never be "Little" ever again - in fact, on the inside - he was a giant. The end. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Economics Of Free Energy I worked for an electric utility for over 20 years. They make their money when the rate commissions allow them to add a couple percentage points over their operating costs. The operating costs are made mostly of fuel costs and generation costs. If there was a vast source of virtually free energy (perhaps like my Lateral Energy Micro Hydro Generation) it would lower the utilities' operating costs to a very low number which would in turn drop the bottom out of their profits. I have long felt that there may be many concepts for free/low-cost energy, but that because utility companies have so much to lose, they ensure that none of the concepts really get off the ground. I think it will require some people of vision to develop these concepts independent of the utilities. The present setup has too much political clout that wants to keep things just the way they are. How much money do you suppose a utility would be willing to pay to keep a source of free energy from coming to market? To what lengths might they go to preserve the status quo? |
| 9 | Somalia, Einstein, & Foreign Policy Albert Einstein was very fond of thought experiments. Lets take two thought experiments now: For the first, assume we are pre- 9/11. Suppose Canada determined that terrorists are in the USA training at flight schools. They also learn that the terrorists are in Boston, planning some form of terrorist action. Canada then launches air strikes at flight training schools in Florida and Arizona. They also launch an airstrike in the Boston neighborhood where they think the terrorists might be having a meeting. How would these actions by Canada make you feel as an American? For the second thought experiment, lets assume we have learned that Tim McVeigh (who we think might be responsible for the Oklahoma City bombing) might be home. We launch an airstrike against his neighborhood. We then sift through the rubble to try to find his body in the rubble. How would this make you feel as an American? These two thought experiments illustrate EXACTLY what we are doing on foreign soil. WE seem to think that untold collateral damage is OK - as long as it happens on foreign soil. The problem is that often the person we were after wasn't there (the first cruise missile attack of the current Iraq war, trying to get Saddam Hussein is a good example). Even if the desired person is killed in the attack, the collateral damage from the attack devastates the lives of countless others. How can the victims of collateral damage, their family, their friends - be expected to be pro-USA after something like that? The Bush administration just can't figure out where all these enemies are coming from - guess what? By and large they are being created by our own actions. I wish our country would wake up and re-read some of our country's foundation documents. We would read that at one time we thought that all men (and women and children) were created equal and had certain rights. Not just the people in the USA but ALL people. We should conduct ourselves on foreign soil the same we we conduct ourselves on our home soil. If we think a bad guy is in some building - surround the building with people, arrest the guy you're after, and let the innocent bystanders go on with their life. Don't blow up the whole neighborhood! Now we're doing airstrikes in Somalia at residential targets. I wouldn't be surprised to see that we create more enemies in that country too compared to the number of alleged bad guys we eliminate. As a US citizen, I feel our foundation is all about doing the right things the right way (our Bill of Rights). On foreign soil, I think we are trying to do some right things, but we are doing them the wrong way. I think until we bring our foreign tactics and techniques inline with our domestic tactics and techniques, we can continue to expect that we will create enemies everywhere we go. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | "Al-Qaeda"
and "Suspected Al-Qaeda" and Bush Policy I frequently find myself wondering about the definition of "Al-Qaeda." I know they are folks who want the infidels out of Muslim countries, but how do you know somebody is one? Do they they have Al-Qaeda ID cards? Maybe a secret handshake? Or wind their turban's a certain way? How many "Al-Qaeda" are there in the world today? If you were once "Al-Qaeda" can you quit? I think a clear definition of what it means to be "Al-Qaeda" is important - especially the distinction between a belief and actions. And what exactly is the USA policy toward Al-Qaeda people? Are we trying to kill them all? Apparently you don't even have to be a full fledged "Al-Qaeda" to be on our hit-list - at times being only a "Suspected Al-Qaeda" seems to carry with it a death sentence (and associated air strike). How does the USA determine that somebody is "Al-Qaeda" anyway? If being "Al-Qaeda" is simply the mindset that you want foreign troops out of your country - is that really so bad? Should you be killed for a mindset? On the other hand, if somebody is carrying out an action that will cause harm to others, they should probably be arrested, but an action is quite different from a mindset. Since so much of President Bush's "Al-Qaeda McCarthy-ism" (there's Al-Qaeda behind every rock) results in military actions, I think the American people should be told what his definition of "Al-Qaeda" is, what criteria the intelligence community uses to affix the label of "Al-Qaeda" to somebody, and just what our policy is toward people all over the world who may be considered "Al-Qaeda." |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Photo-Friendly Public Displays Every year, untold thousands of photos are taken at museums, car shows, and other public displays. And about 99.95% of those photos are awful. You see, a typic camera has an electronic flash that has an effective range from about 4-12ft. Most of the items being photographed are well beyond 12ft and not lit for proper photos. I think if the poeple running these public displays gave the issue some thought, they would realize that it is in THEIR best interest to have the public taking great photos of their display. When people show each other their photos, good photos might intice others to visit the show, buy the car, etc. Rather than spend the money to have flood lights on these public displays all the time with enough light to get proper image exposure, they should set up a couple electronic flashes in the display (run on a/c adapters) and triggered by a photo slave unit (about $25 - see http://www.adorama.com/LTACMS.html?searchinfo=slave&item_no=6 for a typical expample). With a setup like this, when a visitor takes a flash photo, their flash triggers the slave unit which fires the display's electronic flashes. The end result would be visitors with better quality photos of what was on display. And as mentioned earlier, visitors with better photos should be a desired outcome of the person who owns the displays ~ a couple inexpensive slaves and inexpensive flash units can make a considerable difference. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | Railroad Passenger Service - New Visions Every time I visit a large city, I'm always perplexed by the grid-locked passenger traffic. I've taken public transportation trains, but they don't feel very user-friendly which I believe is why they're not utilized more. They have to make too many stops in order to provide service and you usually have to wait a while for the next train.. My vision for public service rail transportation would achieve prompt, fast, personal service while eliminating all the stops. It would work something like this:
|
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 28 | |
| 29 | |
| 30 | |
| 31 |
Comment/Response?