Daily activities of the owner of a 20 acre Organic
Farm plus
observations, notes, and comments on a wide variety of topics.
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | 2006 Election (What's Wrong In Iraq) I think hidden in the outcome of the US election are hints as to why things aren't going so well in Iraq . . . or perhaps why things which seem to work here, don't work over there. Going back in history, the US came to being as colony of England. One of England's central tenents was that of parlimentary procedure. We had a tough time directly copying the English system, so we adapted their concepts in Robert's Rules Of Order - the protocol for how to run a meeting, how to run a country. This is where things like "majority rules, the minority yields to the majority, silence is consent, and rights of the minority to express their opinion" come from. We have been living under this set of rules for over 200 years now. So when we have an election, even though there are millions of voters who wanted a particular candidate, if there is another candidate getting more votes, the minority (even though there may be millions in the minority) accepts the majority decision and goes on with life. Now think about Iraq. They have been under a ruthless dictator for 30 some years. Rather than have a majority rule - they're used to have a single person rule. Any minority trying to express an opinion was dealt with harshly. Suddenly these people are given voting rights. When the votes are counted, their candidate may not have won. But they can see from the results that there are millions of others who voted the same way they did (and lost). So you have a population who is not used to being asked what they want - finally being able to express their desires by voting - and for many, not getting what they wanted. Got to be frustrating. Especially, when the people haven't grown up under a climate of Robert's Rules. I think in many cases, the increased violence may be linked to their free elctions where the people weren't adequately prepared for their candidates to lose. Now, by the vote tallies, they can only see the large numbers of others that thought the same way they did. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 28 | |
| 29 | |
| 30 | |
| 31 |
Comment/Response? 